Yeah, it's true. Unbelievable, but true. I don't have one single CoD game. As I said, I'm not judging the game. I played the MW2 demo and the Black Ops demo which is good in terms of SP gameplay, can't argue here. But it does make me angry when I hear bullsh*t like "We cancelled this project because we are taking the opportunity to work on one of the best gaming experiences ever made" (CoD) or "We consider this product not flawless enough to compete within today's open world game industry" coming from Activision. WAIT a minute... Activision + flawless? An outright lie on the edge of nonsense, they just don't want to admit that CoD brings them more cash in their pockets, because there are fanboys going mental for CoD.

And then comes what I heard about CoD, and it sounded as far away from "flawless" as Neptune from Earth. SP might be good, as I mentioned, but the MP seems to be really f*cked up. Now if I don't count the fanboys in, I rarely ever heard anything positive about the game at all, and I got the feeling that even I'm the only one who thought Black Ops' SP gameplay may be decent... so there's something wrong, isn't it.

Even if it was 100 Million sales, I'm not the person to go with the "mainstream" anyway. If something can impress a hundred million people, then that doesn't necessarily mean it can impress me. There are 7 CoD games and from what I heard they don't have big differences, but 15 of 20 million people will buy them just because of the title, or just because "everyone else buys it too". Fk that. Excuse my language, I would like to see some new gameplay, that would truly impress (and not only) me. True Crime Hong Kong looked like a open world game milestone to me, because it's taking place in an environment never seen in any game before. The question is why did they scrap something new for something old.