Editor VS Editor. Let the war begin.

[(CDG) maxpower]

The only ones I've used on the list are FC2 (PC and console), Forge, LBP, and Sandbox. I tried the ModNation editor in the demo, did not like. Liked THPS early editors, but never played Underground.

Sandbox is the best and the others aren't even close. FC2 was the easiest, Forge is annoying, and LBP just seemed pointless (2D).

Not on the list, but I like ChromeEd alot. Easier to learn then Sandbox, just not many games being developed on Chrome Engine 4.

[EMP]

As I said in chat earlier, I'd vote Sandbox right off if it weren't so damn hard to learn. I figured out the essentials of all the other editors in about an hour or two. It took me about the same length of time digging through tutorials to find out how to place some friggin' terrain in Sandbox.

^This. If Sandbox was a bit easier to handle, not only I would've probably gone for that. Considering it's a quite an annoying process to learn stuff on it (although I must admit I didn't try any tutorials back then), Sandbox loses big parts of it's appeal.

I haven't used it for about 1 and a half years though, maybe I should try again, I'm almost certain I'd have more success on learning it today.

FC2 was the easiest, Forge is annoying, and LBP just seemed pointless (2D).

I agree, Forge is annoying, but I don't consider LBP's editor as pointless, infact it's a pretty effective tool, despite being 2D.

[(CDG) maxpower]

I agree, Forge is annoying, but I don't consider LBP's editor as pointless, infact it's a pretty effective tool, despite being 2D.

Just to clarify, my comments were in regards to LBP. I think the LBP2 editor looks much more robust with some interesting possibilities.

[(CDG)CaptainDEEZ]

I've never used the Doom or LBP editors so my vote for FC2 still sticks.